----- Original Message -----
From: Marco
To: Bill Thomas
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 6:05 AM
Subject: Re: The clinching proofs!!

Hi Victor,

I read your new article and I have to say, it's the best I have read from you :) ... It's really logical and pretty easy to understand, if you think about the fact, that antarctica is close to africa, southamerica and India ... We only see the earth in the equatorial birdseye-view mostly ... so thats the only thing you have to really imagine and its clear.

Although I don't know 100% what exactly you mean with the INVERSION ... how does it invert ? Maybe you can show me in the picture "howdoestheearthsmagnetfieldchange.jpg" I drew the constellation right before 22.12.2012 and left the earths axis away in the part for right after the 22.12.2012.

fastsketch 1 and 2 are just for you to see what I mean with the suns polar magnetfield winding up ... all other clean scans I have from a book... you can use them for your page, if you want :) ... one is called "Hapgoodpolechange.jpg" and shows how the poles change in the way Charles Hapgood thinks they do. I think that matches your inversion-theory somehow ... ?!

It would be nice, if you could show me how the axis changes after 22.12.2012 and how this brought you to the nodes positions ... (thats the next step to be proofed :) )

and again I have to ask this question just to be sure you really see it:
what about the maya pyramids, why did they survive the last time the poles of the sun changed ?

So I hope the sketches and scans match your theory in a way ... If you give me instructions, I can do real nice looking drawings about the axis change and node-proof thing ...

Marco